AREA ELECTRIC SERVICE, INC. AND FEISCO CLAIMS, APPELLANTS,
v.
JOHN CUNNINGHAM, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
In this workers' compensation appeal, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the deputy commissioner's finding that the claimant suffered compensable work injuries (carpal tunnel syndrome in both wrists) but reversed the award of temporary total disability (TTD) benefits for lack of sufficient medical evidence covering the entire award period.
The court affirmed the finding of compensable work injuries but reversed the TTD award for insufficient evidence of continuous total disability throughout the award period, remanding for further evidence. The court affirmed the deputy commissioner's decision to reject the employer's late-raised defense as prejudicially untimely.
[1] Temporary total disability benefits require medical evidence of a claimant's inability to work or evidence of a good faith work search.
[2] A claimant's carpal tunnel syndrome may support a finding of temporary total disability even if the disability fluctuates, provided sufficient evidence is presented.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“TTD benefits may ordinarily be awarded only where there is medical evidence of a claimant's inability to work or, alternatively, evidence of a good faith work search.”
Establishes the legal standard required for TTD benefits awards in workers' compensation cases
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe claimant, John Cunningham, suffered a workplace accident in January 1987 while working for Area Electric Service, Inc. Medical evidence showed Dr.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Medical Evidence Of Inability To Work cases and more on FLexlaw
SHIVERS, Judge.
The employer/carrier (E/C) in this workers’ compensation case appeal an order awarding the appellee/claimant future medical treatment and temporary total disability (TTD) benefits, raising several arguments. We find ample competent substantial evidence in the record to support the deputy commissioner’s (DC’s) conclusions that the claimant suffered an accident while working for the E/C in January of 1987, and that the claimant sustained injuries to his wrists as a result of that accident. However, we agree with the E/C that there is. insufficient evidence to support the DC’s award of TTD benefits from February 11, 1987 (date of accident) through October 13, 1987 (hearing date), and remand for further evidence on that point.
TTD benefits may ordinarily be awarded only where there is medical evidence of a claimant’s inability to work or, alternatively, evidence of a good faith work search. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Williams, 512 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Citrus County Human Services v. Cross, 485 So. 2d 874 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). The medical evidence presented in this case established only that the claimant was told by his treating physician (Dr. Penner) not to work between the dates of February 20, 1987 and March 2, 1987, and that an independent examining physician (Dr. Dolce) found claimant to be totally disabled on July 10, 1987 — the only date Dolce examined the claimant.
The record is inconclusive that the claimant was TTD at the beginning and throughout the period awarded by the DC. Although there is some evidence in the record that the claimant conducted a job search in connection with a wage-loss claim against a former employer, no job search forms were admitted into evidence at the hearing in the instant case, the record does not indicate when the search was conducted or how many prospective employers were contacted, nor did the DC make a finding regarding the adequacy or inadequacy of a job search. We recognize that the nature of the claimant’s condition (carpal tunnel syndrome in both wrists) is not such that his disability would be likely to “come and go” and, therefore, that the claimant may very well have been TTD before, after, and/or between the dates that his two physicians found him to be disabled. Since the evidence in the record does not support such a finding, however, we reverse the award of TTD and remand for the DC to hear more evidence on that issue.
We affirm the DC’s decision not to allow the E/C to raise a defense based on Martin Co. v. Carpenter, 132 So. 2d 400 (Fla.1961) at the October 13, 1987 hearing. The record indicates that the E/C did not raise the defense at the September 30,1987 pretrial conference, but instead waited until two working days prior to the hearing (during one of which claimant’s counsel was involved in another trial) to advise claimant’s counsel of his intention to raise the defense. The E/C have failed to establish on appeal that the DC erred in finding the late raising of the defense to be prejudicial to the claimant.
The DC’s award of TTD benefits is hereby reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
BOOTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Philpot v. City OF Miami, 541 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)…d reports. Generally, an award of temporary partial disability or temporary total disability benefits requires medical evidence of the claimant’s inability to work, or evidence of a good faith work search. Area Electric Service, Inc. v. Cunningham, 538 So. 2d 471 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Williams, 512 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Mt. Sinai Medical Center v. Jacobs, 492 So. 2d 1143 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Vantage Pointe v. Sowers, 463 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). On t…
-
Isaac v. Green Iguana, Inc., 871 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)…etermined it was a violation of due process to allow the employer/carrier to proceed with the fraud defense, erred in reversing that ruling without giving claimant notice and an opportunity to be heard. See Area Electric Service, Inc. v. Cunningham, 538 So. 2d 471, 472-73 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)(hoIding that it was prejudicial to a claimant for the employer/carrier to raise a defense of fraud in the procurement of employment two days before trial, when the employer/carrier failed to raise that defense at the pre-…
-
Town & Country Farms & Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Peck, 611 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)…utes. Reynolds v. Neisner Bros., Inc., 436 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) (absent evidence of any residual need for future medical treatment, claimant was not entitled to award of future medical benefits); Area Electric Service, Inc. v. Cunningham, 538 So. 2d 471 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) (reversed and remanded for the JCC to hear more evidence on issue of TTD where the record was inconclusive regarding whether or not claimant was TTD throughout the period award by the JCC). The JCC did not err in awarding costs…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Martin Co. & Cont'l Cas. Co. v. Drucella Carpenter & Fla. Indus. Comm'n, 132 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 1961)
- S. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Williams, 512 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
- Citrus Cnty. Human Servs. & Mission Ins. Co. v. Cross, 485 So. 2d 874 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)