MARTIN COUNTY LIQUORS, INC. D/B/A MARTIN COUNTY LIQUORS, APPELLANT,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Stacey v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 547 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
  …proper remedy is to reverse and remand this cause for further proceedings in accordance with the Florida Administrative Procedure Act, see Martin County Liquors, Inc. v. Department of Business Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, 539 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Cole v. Department of Professional Regulation, 502 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). Reversed. BOOTH, WIGGINTON and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.…
• Haisfield v. ACP Fla. Holdings, Inc., 629 So. 2d 963 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)
  …., 474 So. 2d 212 (Fla.1985), where a verdict liquidates damages as of a date certain (when plaintiffs out-of-pocket, pecuniary losses become certain), the plaintiff is entitled to prejudgment interest from the date of loss. See also Thomas v. Toth, 539 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). In the present case, the date of loss was the date of termination of the lis pendens, which is November 30, 1990. Therefore, Peabey is entitled to 12% prejudgment interest from November 30, 1990. The trial court’s award of attor…
• Burr v. Norris, 667 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)
  …enrichment count it awarded him $2,750. Under the circumstances of this case, the trial court must order prejudgment interest on the damages for unjust enrichment. See Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing Co., 474 So. 2d 212 (Fla.1985); Thomas v. Toth, 539 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). Reversed and remanded for further proceedings in accord with this opinion. FRANK and FULMER, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

• Cole v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 502 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)