GEORGE W. DEEN AND JOHN M. BELL, APPELLANTS,

v.

WETHERED B. THOMAS, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Masser v. The London Operating Co., 106 Fla. 474 (Fla. 1932)
  …] A dismissal without prejudice is generally proper wherever the case has been disposed of for a reason not reaching the merits, and it is probable that the plaintiff might be able to make out a good case. 21 C. J. 639; Deem vs. Thomas, 51 Fla. 644, 40 So. 765; Meffert vs. Thomas, 51 Fla. 492, 40 So. 764. The lessor concedes that the bill is without equity and that the decree dismissing the cause for that reason was proper. The appellees agree that the cause should have been dismissed, but say it should…
• Dorfman v. State, 351 So. 2d 954 (Fla. 1977)
  …In fact, both the rules and statutes of this state have contemplated the imposition either of consecutive or concurrent sentences as to each. See § 921.16, Fla.Stat. (1971); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.722. . See, for example, Washington v. State, 51 Fla. 137, 40 So. 765 (1906). . Although not affecting this case, we note that the Legislature has now abolished general sentences in the vast majority of cases. § 775.-021(4), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1976). . The criticism is that general sentences undercut the rehabilitative…
• Whitton v. State, 93 Fla. 97 (Fla. 1927)
  …at the time of the act complained of any such case or causes as are made ground or grounds of divorce in the State of Florida. There was a general verdict and under the authority of the decision in the case of Washington v. the State, 51 Fla. 137; 40 Sou. 765, such verdicts are held to apply to each count of the indictment. There were three assignments of error: 1. “The Court erred in sustaining the objection of the State to testimony showing that the wife was able to earn her own living. 2. The Court…