LUIS FERNANDO USQUIANO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Conviction for cocaine trafficking affirmed, but sentence of thirty years vacated and remanded because the trial court improperly departed from mandatory minimum by considering the quantity of drugs, which is already factored into the offense level.
A trial court may not depart upward from a mandatory minimum sentence based on the quantity of drugs involved, as that factor is already incorporated into the statutory offense definition.
[1] A trial court may not depart upward from a mandatory minimum sentence for drug trafficking based on the quantity of drugs involved, as that quantity is already incorporat…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Justice demands that one convicted of trafficking in 8898 grams of cocaine receive a greater punishment than one convicted in trafficking in 4½% of that amount.”
Trial court's written reasons for departing upward from the mandatory minimum sentence, which the appellate court found improper.
Luis Fernando Usquiano was convicted of trafficking in 8,898 grams of cocaine and sentenced to thirty years in prison and a $250,000 fine, departing f…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Departure From Guidelines cases and more on FLexlaw
DANAHY, Acting Chief Judge.
The appellant, Luis Fernando Usquiano, was convicted of trafficking in more than 400 grams of cocaine, and was sentenced to serve thirty-years in prison and to pay a $250,000 fine. On appeal, the appellant challenges both his conviction and sentence. We find merit only in the appellant's sentencing issue and remand to the trial court on that issue alone. We find no merit in the appellant’s other contentions and, accordingly, affirm the appellant’s conviction.
In sentencing the appellant, the trial court departed from the minimum mandatory sentence of fifteen years (section 893.-135(1)(b)(3), Florida Statutes (1987)), and sentenced the appellant to serve thirty years in prison. The court gave the following written reasons to depart:
As the legislature has determined that one found guilty of trafficking in 400 grams of cocaine should be imprisoned for 15 years, what should the appropriate sentence be for one convicted of trafficking in 22 times 400? To suggest that the sentence should be the same is an affront to justice. Justice demands that one convicted of trafficking in 8898 grams of cocaine receive a greater punishment than one convicted in trafficking in 4½% of that amount.
The trial court thus clearly departed because of the greater amount of narcotics involved in the crime. This is improper under Atwaters v. State, 519 So. 2d 611 (Fla.1988). See also Restrepo v. State, 533 So. 2d 1180 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). We therefore vacate the appellant’s sentence and remand to the trial court for resentencing within the guidelines range.
LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Atwaters v. State, 519 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 1988)
- Cook v. State, 533 So. 2d 1180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
- Restrepo v. State, 533 So. 2d 1180 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)