TODD PAUL PELTER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
TODD PAUL PELTER, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
540 So. 2d 229
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
DAUKSCH, Judge.
This is an appeal from a sentence. The sentencing judge imposed adult sanctions on a child without complying with section 39.111(7)(d), Florida Statutes (1987) which requires specific written findings of suitability pursuant to the criteria set out in section 39.111(7)(c), Florida Statutes (1987). The sentence is vacated and this cause remanded for proper resentencing. State v. Rhoden, 448 So. 2d 1013 (Fla.1984).
SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.
SHARP, C.J., and GOSHORN, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fieselman v. State, 566 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 1990)…PER CURIAM. We have for review two cases: Fieselman v. State, 537 So. 2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), based upon conflict with Baker v. State, 518 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); and Williams v. State, 540 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989), based upon conflict with Fieselman and Mitchell v. State, 538 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). We have jurisdiction over these consolidated cases. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We approve the opinion of the district court below…
-
Woods v. State, 561 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)…iorari. They seek review of a decision of the circuit court, sitting in its appellate capacity, which reversed a county court order granting the defendants’ motions in limine. We decline to grant the writ for the reasons stated in Williams v. State, 540 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989), and Baker v. State, 518 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). [*453] The defendants have an adequate remedy by plenary appeal if the trial court enters a judgment of conviction. Writ DENIED. DAUKSCH and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.…
-
State v. Williams, 584 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)…] be addressed only where it is essential to the determination of a case and that the case cannot be decided on other grounds. Williams then petitioned this court for a writ of certiorari, but it was denied on procedural grounds. Williams v. State, 540 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). In Fieselman v. State, 566 So. 2d 768 (Fla.1990), the supreme court declared the circuit court’s decision void because only district courts may consider appeals from a county court where statutes are declared to be invalid. The…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Learnhart Rhoden, 448 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 1984)