WILLIE F. LEONARD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WILLIE F. LEONARD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
540 So. 2d 253
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. We believe the trial court acted within the broad discretion afforded it under section 39.111, Florida Statutes (1987).
ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thilem v. Thilem, 662 So. 2d 1314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…ity as reflected by the record. See § 61.30(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (1993); Brooks v. Brooks, 602 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Gildea v. Gildea, 593 So. 2d 1212 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Marshall v. Marshall, 596 So. 2d 675 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Caskey v. Pratt, 540 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Palmer v. Palmer, 530 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Specifically, the record reflects the wife performed secretarial duties while married and failed to seek similar work when the parties separated. Yet the trial court unexplain…
-
Zayas v. Zayas, 625 So. 2d 1330 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Section 61.30(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (1991); Marshall v. Marshall, 596 So. 2d 675 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); see Polley v. Polley, 588 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Caskey v. Pratt, 540 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).…