HARRY S. CASKEY, APPELLANT,
v.
BRENDA S. PRATT, F/K/A BRENDA S. CASKEY, APPELLEE
HARRY S. CASKEY, APPELLANT,
BRENDA S. PRATT, F/K/A BRENDA S. CASKEY, APPELLEE
540 So. 2d 253
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Topics
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Voluntary Underemployment cases and more on FLexlaw
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm as to all issues except the award of child support. Section 61.30(2)(b), Florida Statutes, provides that:
Income shall be imputed to an unemployed or underemployed parent when such employment or underemployment is found to be voluntary on that parent’s part, absent physical or mental incapacity or other circumstances over which that parent has no control_ [Hjowever, the court may refuse to impute income to a primary residential parent if the court finds it necessary for the parent to stay home with the child.
The wife in this case had voluntarily ceased employment subsequent to her second marriage, apparently at the request of her second husband. Since the trial court did not consider the imputation of income to the wife in considering the child support guidelines, we reverse the child support award and remand for the trial court to consider the imputation of such income on remand.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thilem v. Thilem, 662 So. 2d 1314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…ity as reflected by the record. See § 61.30(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (1993); Brooks v. Brooks, 602 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Gildea v. Gildea, 593 So. 2d 1212 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Marshall v. Marshall, 596 So. 2d 675 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Caskey v. Pratt, 540 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Palmer v. Palmer, 530 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Specifically, the record reflects the wife performed secretarial duties while married and failed to seek similar work when the parties separated. Yet the trial court unexplain…
-
Zayas v. Zayas, 625 So. 2d 1330 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Section 61.30(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (1991); Marshall v. Marshall, 596 So. 2d 675 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); see Polley v. Polley, 588 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Caskey v. Pratt, 540 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).…