INTERNATIONAL BANKERS INS., APPELLANT,
v.
SUSAN ARNONE, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1988-12-12
Nos. 87-00623, 87-00999 and 87-01446
540 So. 2d 832 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1988) Negative Treatment
Cited by 9 cases

Opinion of the Court

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

ORDERED that the Appellant’s August 31, 1988, Motion for Rehearing/Certification is hereby denied. Further,

ORDERED that the Appellant’s August 31, 1988, Motion to Stay the Mandate is denied without prejudice to refile the motion upon filing of petition in the Supreme Court.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Telisia Shaonte Kelley v. Rice, 800 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
    …s indicated an intent to continue exercising nonexistent jurisdiction over Ms. Kelley, we may prevent him from doing so by way of prohibition. See State ex. rel. Gillham v. Phillips, 193 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966); Anderson Inv. Co. Ltd. v. Lynch, 540 So. 2d 832 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). [*251] MERITS Our analysis of the merits turns in part on the nature of Ms. Kelley’s conviction. The record is ambiguous in this respect, but it suggests four possibilities. The first is set forth in the written judgment, which…
  • Fabber v. Judge John D. Wessel, 604 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)
    …submitted expressly in his name. . Frankly, we question the wisdom of the rule that the judge is the only proper respondent in a petition for a writ of prohibition, especially where disqualification is sought. See, e.g., Anderson Inv. Co. v. Lynch, 540 So. 2d 832 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). There is nothing in rule 1.432, Fla.R.Civ.P., rule 9.100, Fla.R.App.P., or section 38.10, Fla.Stat. (1991), so requiring. If the supreme court's holding that trial judges are limited to a determination of facial sufficiency only…
  • Plantation-Simon Inc. v. Doured Al Bahloul, 596 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)
    …m the essential requirements of the law. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197, 1202-03 (Fla.1980). The partnership argues that it was entitled to the protective order as a matter of right by our decision in Anderson Investments Co. v. Lynch, 540 So. 2d 832 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). In that case, we treated a petition for prohibition as one for certiorari and quashed a trial court order finding a witness in contempt of court for failing to appear at a deposition. The party seeking the writ was a partnership…

Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw