ROY LESTLY SALMON, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Blumberg v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co., 790 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 2001)
  …red and granted summary judgment in Peat, Mar-wick’s favor. On appeal, the Third District Court of Appeal reversed, finding that the limitations period commenced when the judgment was entered in tax court. See Lane v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 540 So. 2d 922 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). After granting the petition for review, this Court agreed with the district court: In this case, the Lanes chose to appeal the IRS’s determination to the United States Tax Court, in accordance with the advice given them by Peat…
• Peat v. Lane, 565 So. 2d 1323 (Fla. 1990)
  …OVERTON, Justice. This cause is before the Court on petition to review Lane v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 540 So. 2d 922 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), in which the Third District Court of Appeal held that the limitations period for a cause of action for accounting malpractice commenced when the United States Tax Court entered judgment against the Lanes, rather than when the Int…
• Spivey v. Trader, 620 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)
  …not disputed. LAW AND ANALYSIS Section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1991), governs actions against lawyers and provides for a two year period in which an action may be brought after such action accrues. In Lane v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 540 So. 2d 922 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), approved, 565 So. 2d 1323 (Fla.1990), taxpayers sued their accountant for malpractice as a result of an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) decision disallowing certain deductions. The firm argued the limitations period commenced when…