BILLY PINCKNEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1989-03-28
No. 88-1159
SMITH, C.J., and SHIVERS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
541 So. 2d 704 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Rule 9.315(a), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, we affirm the trial court’s denial of Pinckney’s petition for writ of habeas corpus.

SMITH, C.J., and SHIVERS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …mages for the wrongly rejected goods. It was entitled to prejudgment interest from that date, and we remand for the award of same. The trial court’s award of attorney’s fee to appellee on its claim is affirmed. See Vanuchi v. Miami Purveyors, Inc., 541 So. 2d 704 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). The cross-appeal is affirmed, cross-appellant having waived argument thereon for lack of a transcript. GLICKSTEIN, DELL and WARNER, JJ., concur.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw