DELORES LYNN BLOK, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Appellant's conviction for manslaughter by culpable negligence was reversed because the evidence, viewed most favorably to the state, failed to establish the requisite degree of gross negligence and reckless disregard for human life.
The evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support a conviction for manslaughter by culpable negligence because it did not rise to the level of gross, flagrant conduct showing reckless disregard for human life.
[1] Culpable negligence manslaughter requires proof of gross, flagrant conduct showing reckless disregard for human life, a standard higher than simple negligence.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the degree of negligence necessary to prove culpable negligence is greater than that which is required to prove simple negligence”
Distinguishing the standard for culpable negligence from simple negligence
Delores Lynn Blok was convicted of manslaughter by culpable negligence under Florida Statute § 782.07.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Wantonness Or Recklessness cases and more on FLexlaw
THOMPSON, Judge.
Delores Lynn Blok appeals her conviction for manslaughter by culpable negligence pursuant to § 782.07, Fla.Stat., and argues that the trial court erred in denying her motion for judgment of acquittal. We agree and reverse.
In determining the sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction of manslaughter by culpable negligence the evidence on appeal must be interpreted and considered in the manner most favorable to the state. Scarborough v. State, 188 So. 2d 877 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966). Construing the evidence adduced in the instant case in the light most favorable to the state establishes that, as a matter of law, the state failed to prove a prima facie case of culpable negligence manslaughter. The degree of negligence necessary to prove culpable negligence is greater than that which is required to prove simple negligence. Walter v. State, 157 Fla. 684, 26 So. 2d 821 (1946). The evidence adduced in the instant case does not rise to the level of gross, flagrant conduct showing a reckless disregard for human life or the safety of persons exposed to its dangerous effects, or wantonness or recklessness, or a grossly careless disregard for the safety or rights of others that constitutes culpable negligence. Accordingly, the conviction and sentence for manslaughter by culpable negligence is reversed.
WENTWORTH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ybor Med. Injury & Accident Clinic, Inc. v. Agency for Healthcare Admin., 43 Fla. L. Weekly D1493 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020)…e lesser action against the licensee that, as here, "has the effect of" a suspension or revocation. In denying relief in this same circumstance, the First District in Beach Club relied specifically on Terrell Oil Co. v. Department of Transportation, 541 So. 2d 713 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), and Silver Show, Inc. v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation, 763 So. 2d 348 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). See Beach Club, 43 Fla. L. Weekly at D1493. In Terrell Oil, 541 So. 2d at 715, the court observed that there is "a…
-
Beach Club Adult Ctr. v. Agency For Health Care Admin. (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)
Authorities Cited
- Buford T. Scarborough v. State, 188 So. 2d 877 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)
- Walter v. State, 157 Fla. 684 (Fla. 1946)