ERIC ADGER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ERIC ADGER, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
541 So. 2d 799
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We reverse and hold that the trial court erred in denying the appellant’s motion to suppress. See Martinez v. State, 414 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Wallace v. State, 540 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).
ANSTEAD, LETTS and GARRETT, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Serpa v. State, 555 So. 2d 1210 (Fla. 1989)…BARKETT, Justice. We have for review Serpa v. State, 541 So. 2d 799, 799 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), in which the district court certified the following question to be of great public importance: May evidence obtained as a result of defendant’s consent to search, be suppressed by the trial court as “coerced” upon the sol…
Authorities Cited
- Wallace v. State, 540 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
- Martinez v. State, 414 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)