MARY SUE DUKE, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1989-04-20
No. 72912
EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
541 So. 2d 1170 Florida Supreme Court (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 22 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Children convicted of offenses punishable by death or life imprisonment must be sentenced as adults, regardless of prior statutory interpretations that allowed for different treatment.


Headnotes

[1] Children convicted of offenses punishable by death or life imprisonment shall be sentenced as adults and are not subject to youthful offender provisions.

[2] Amendments to statutory provisions regarding the transfer of children for criminal prosecution override prior judicial interpretations of the statutes.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Petitioner, a minor, was convicted of a life felony after being indicted. The trial court imposed adult sanctions, and the appellate court affirmed, c…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
SHAW, Justice.

SHAW, Justice.

We review Duke v. State, 529 So. 2d 341 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), to resolve a certified issue of great public importance. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Petitioner’s husband was convicted and sentenced for sexual battery of an eleven-year-old child. Petitioner, who was fifteen years old, was indicted and convicted of a life felony, aiding and abetting, and sentenced to seven years imprisonment. On appeal, petitioner claimed the trial court erred by not considering a predisposition report and the statutory criteria for determining the suitability of adult sanctions, and in not analyzing in writing the decision to impose adult sanctions when “a child has been transferred for criminal prosecution.” § 39.111, Fla.Stat. (1985). Reading chapter 39, Florida Statutes (1985), in pari mate-ria, the district court found that an indictment for an offense punishable by death or life imprisonment did not constitute a “transfer” within the meaning of section 39.02(6), Florida Statutes (1985), and did not require compliance with section 39.-111(6). The district court distinguished Goodson v. State, 392 So. 2d 1335 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980), approved, 403 So. 2d 1337 (Fla.1981), and State v. Upshaw, 469 So. 2d 922 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), but certified the issue as a matter of great public importance.

In Goodson, the district court rejected the proposition that a child charged by indictment was not “transferred” for purposes of qualifying for sentencing as a youthful offender under section 958.-04(l)(a), Florida Statutes (Supp.1978). The court relied on the wording of sections 39.02(5)(d) and 39.02(6), Florida Statutes (Supp.1978), which read respectively:

“[§ 39.02(5) ](d) Once a child has been transferred for criminal prosecution pursuant to a waiver hearing, indictment, or information and has been found to have committed the offense for which he is transferred or a lesser-included offense, a child shall thereafter be handled in every respect as if he were an adult for any subsequent violation of Florida law.

[§ 39.02](6) When a child has been transferred for criminal prosecution as an adult and the child has been found to have committed a violation of Florida law, the disposition of the case shall be made pursuant to s. 39.111(6). [Emphasis supplied.]”

Goodson, 392 So. 2d at 1337. Based on the statutory wording as it then existed, the district court concluded:

Thus, although a child, whether indicted, informed against, or otherwise waived over to adult court, will in most respects be treated as if an adult, chapters 39 and 958 clearly provide some limitations as to the manner and extent of sentencing such persons as adults.

Id. (footnote omitted). On review, we adopted the district court language as our own, noting that if it were otherwise, an anomaly would be created whereby indicted persons eighteen to twenty-one years of age could be sentenced as youthful offenders whereas indicted children could not be. We concluded that the legislature did not intend such a result.

The case here is not controlled by Good-son. While the Goodson decision was pending before this Court, the legislature amended and clarified the pertinent provisions of the statute. Chapter 81-269, section 1, Laws of Florida, amended section 39.02(5)(d) by deleting the word “indictment” and by creating subsection (5)(c)3. which specifically enumerated sentencing criteria of indicted children upon conviction.

3. If the child is found to have committed the offense punishable by death or by life imprisonment, the child shall be sentenced as an adult. If the child is not found to have committed the indictable offense but is found to have committed a lesser included offense or any other offense for which he was indicted as a part of the criminal episode, the court may sentence as follows: pursuant to the provisions of s. 39.111(6); pursuant to the provisions of chapter 958, notwithstanding any other provisions of that chapter to the contrary; or as an adult. Once a child has been indicted pursuant to this paragraph and has been found to have committed any offense for which he was indicted as a part of the criminal episode, the child shall thereafter be handled in every respect as if he were an adult for any subsequent violation of Florida law, unless the court pursuant to this paragraph imposes juvenile sanctions under s. 39.111(6).

Ch. 81-269, § 1, Laws of Fla. (emphasis supplied). Section 39.02(5)(c)3., Florida Statutes (1981), removes the anomaly referred to in Goodson by establishing consistency with the stipulation in section 958.-04, Florida Statutes (1985), that no person may be sentenced as a youthful offender who has been found guilty of a capital or life felony.

The statutory provisions, as amended, are not those which were interpreted in Goodson. Children of any age who are convicted of offenses punishable by death or life imprisonment shall be sentenced as adults. They shall not be sentenced as youthful offenders and are not subject to the provisions of section 39.111, Florida Statutes (1985). Statutory interpretation is necessarily grounded on the statutes currently in effect or in effect at the time of the crime. There is no confusion if it is recognized that Goodson has been overridden by the legislature.

We approve the decision below.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (11 total)

  • Ritchie v. State, 670 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 1996)
    …So. 2d 528 (Fla.1993).3 The First District affirmed Ritchie’s sentence based on Tomlinson v. State, 589 So. 2d 362 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), review denied, 599 So. 2d 1281 (Fla.1992). In Tomlinson, the court recognized, in accordance with Duke v. State, 541 So. 2d 1170 (Fla.1989), that by deleting the word “indictment” from section 39.02(5)(d), Florida Statutes (Supp.1980),4 and enacting section 39.02(5)(c)3., Florida Statutes (1981),5 the legislature had created [*927] sentencing criteria for indicted children up…
  • Kazakoff v. State, 642 So. 2d 596 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)
    …ire text of the statutory section construed in Tomlinson, reveals that these statutes establish specifically enumerated sentencing criteria for juveniles indicted and convicted of offenses punishable by death or life imprisonment. See Duke v. State, 541 So. 2d 1170 (Fla.1989); Boudreau v. State, 546 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). Kazakoff was informed against after a waiver hearing, not indicted, for the offenses he was convicted of committing. We now address the troubling transfer issue which caused us to c…
  • Tomlinson v. State, 589 So. 2d 362 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
    …supreme court determined that any child convicted of an offense punishable by death or life imprisonment shall be sentenced as an adult and is not entitled to the special conditions provided in section 39.111, Florida Statutes (1989). Duke v. State, 541 So. 2d 1170 (Fla.1989). The conclusion reached in Duke is based in part on a.historical analysis of section 39.02(5)(d) which, prior to its repeal, provided that a child shall be treated as an adult when “transferred for criminal prosecution pursuant to a waive…

Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw