D.R., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Clements, 668 So. 2d 980 (Fla. 1996)
  …oper where a defendant dies pending resolution of his or her appeal. See Carstens v. State, 638 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Jackson v. State, 559 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Kearns v. State, 536 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); D.R. v. State, 541 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Parker v. State, 530 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Cruz v. State, 137 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962).…
• Wilson v. State, 596 So. 2d 775 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
  …ithout some sort of identifiable legal or de facto entity which stands apart from the associating person, it cannot be said that an “association” has occurred.6 Therefore, we distinguish Bowen from the instant case, as did the court in Day v. State, 541 So. 2d 1202 (Fla.2d 1988), rev. denied, 545 So. 2d 869 (Fla.1989), which reversed a conviction under RICO where a single individual was the associating defendant as well as the enterprise. With reference to Bowen, the Day court stated: It may be that in some i…
• Masonoff v. State, 546 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
  …or associate with himself, as an enterprise, for purposes of RICO. This court has followed the Niski analysis in two cases involving robbery. State v. Smith, 532 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), review denied, 542 So. 2d 990 (Fla.1989); Day v. State, 541 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). Arguably, the robberies involved in Ni-ski and our earlier cases are distinguishable from the issuance of these worthless checks because the name of the sole proprietorship on the checks may have misled the payee and made it eas…

Authorities Cited

• Parker v. State, 530 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)