SOUND BUILDERS, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
L.D. BLANTON GLASS COMPANY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
SOUND BUILDERS, INC., APPELLANT,
L.D. BLANTON GLASS COMPANY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
541 So. 2d 1264
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s confirmation of the arbitrator’s award upon the authority of Weeki Wachee Orchid Gardens, Inc. v. Florida Inland Theatres, Inc., 239 So. 2d 602 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970). We find no error in the trial court’s assessment of prejudgment interest in the absence of a contractual provision or the arbitral decision barring such award. See Goldberger v. Hofco, Inc., 422 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).
AFFIRMED.
LEHAN, A.C.J., and FRANK and PARKER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Field v. Perry, 564 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)…k of Orlando v. Grinned, 416 So. 2d 829 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982), rev. denied, 424 So. 2d 761 (Fla.1982) with Niesz v. Gehris, 418 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982), rev. denied, 427 So. 2d 736 (Fla.1983). See also Durden v. Century 21 Compass Points, Inc., 541 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); American National Self Storage, Inc. v. Lopez-Aguiar, 521 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), rev. denied, 528 So. 2d 1182 (Fla.1988); Opler v. Wynne, 402 So. 2d 1309 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), rev. denied, 412 So. 2d 472 (Fla.1982). . See…
-
Mendelsohn v. Fla. A & M Tape & Packaging, Inc., 602 So. 2d 622 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)…nant by the seller and for enforcement of the covenant. Accordingly, the provision for fees in the agreement was a sufficient legal basis upon which to recover fees in an action to enforce the covenant. Cf. Durden v. Century 21 Compass Points, Inc., 541 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, Lepeska v. Durden, 548 So. 2d 663 (Fla.1989). ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur. STONE, J., dissents with opinion.…
-
Arno Schumann v. Weathers, 643 So. 2d 690 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)…rida has altered the common-law rule by statute2 to permit the estate to be held liable for the torts of its personal representative, provided the tort is committed in the “course of estate administration.” Durden v. Century 21 Compass Points, Inc., 541 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied sub nom. Lepeska v. Durden, 548 So. 2d 663 (Fla.1989). This new rule effectively places the risk of loss on the estate, not on injured third parties. If the personal representative is personally at fault, the estate has…
Authorities Cited
- Chesapeake House, Inc. v. LEE Mut. Ins. Agency, Inc., 239 So. 2d 602 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970)
- Goldberger v. Hofco, Inc., 422 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)