ANDREW J. MICHAELS, APPELLANT,
v.
PETER DUBOSE, ROBERT DUBOSE, SALLY S. DUBOSE, MICHAEL A. DUBOSE, AS CO-PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM J. DUBOSE, JR., DECEASED, GREAT NORTHERN SAVINGS COMPANY, CARDINAL FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, JANE M. PHENEGER, MID-AMERICAN LEASING, INC., AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEES
ANDREW J. MICHAELS, APPELLANT,
PETER DUBOSE, ROBERT DUBOSE, SALLY S. DUBOSE, MICHAEL A. DUBOSE, AS CO-PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM J. DUBOSE, JR., DECEASED, GREAT NORTHERN SAVINGS COMPANY, CARDINAL FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, JANE M. PHENEGER, MID-AMERICAN LEASING, INC., AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEES
542 So. 2d 415
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks review of a judgment of foreclosure. We find no merit in appellant’s points on appeal; however, we note concern over the finality vel non of the amended partial summary judgment. In reviewing the totality of the order it appears no judicial labor remains except any future enforcement or deficiency proceedings. The order under review is affirmed.
GLICKSTEIN, DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Asrani v. Ajit Asrani, 591 So. 2d 283 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)…ormer wife’s petition to set aside the final judgment of dissolution of marriage, which approved the parties’ property settlement agreement and adden-dums. We do so on the authority of Casto v. Casto, 508 So. 2d 330 (Fla.1987), and Micale v. Micale, 542 So. 2d 415 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). On the former husband’s cross appeal we also affirm. The evidence showed that the expenses for the wife and the child were approximately $2000 per month; however, the trial court modified the former husband’s obligation for chi…
-
Tubbs v. Tubbs, 648 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)…untarily enter into the agreement. Id. at 334-335. The fact that one party to the agreement apparently made a bad bargain is not a sufficient ground, by itself, to vacate or modify a settlement agreement. Casto, 508 So. 2d at 334; Micale v. Micale, 542 So. 2d 415, 417 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. dismissed, 548 So. 2d 663 (Fla.1989); Cladis v. Cladis, 512 So. 2d 271, 274 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). Nor is the fact that the complaining party has received incompetent legal advice a basis for vacating an agreement in a dissol…