GEORGE BENJAMIN BARBERI, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1989-05-04
No. 88-1280
ERVIN, BOOTH and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.
542 So. 2d 473 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal of restitution orders entered pursuant to appellant’s five criminal convictions. We must remand in order that the trial court specify the amount of restitution in the five sentencing orders. As to three of the offenses, the amounts are set out in the presentence investigation report and need only be transcribed into the orders. For two of the cases, however, restitution amounts were not specified in the presen-tence investigation report, and a hearing is required to set the amounts.

ERVIN, BOOTH and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …the com-pensable injury suffered [in January 1987],” and concluding that “[wjhile the claimant may believe her ... fragile emotional condition [is] the result of her fall, there is no evidence to support that conclusion.” Nelson & Co. v. Holtzclaw, 542 So. 2d 473, 474 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Holtzclaw subsequently filed the instant claim for temporary total disability benefits commencing February 9, 1988, again alleging injury-related anxiety. At the outset of the June 1989 hearing, appellants argued that Holt…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw