JOHN ODEN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1989-05-05
No. 88-00510
RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
542 So. 2d 479 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 21 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of appellant’s community control and subsequent eighteen-month sentence. We remand this case to the trial court for entry of a written order listing the specific conditions of community control appellant was found to have violated. Coley v. State, 479 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (21 total)

  • Rowland v. State, 548 So. 2d 812 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
    …The inclusion of special conditions of probation in a written order that were not orally pronounced at the sentencing hearing mandates a reversal and remand for correction of the written order to conform to the oral pronouncement. Williams v. State, 542 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). Appellant’s final argument is that the condition 13, requiring submission to urinalysis testing, and condition 6, prohibiting use of intoxicants in excess, must be stricken from the probation order because they were not reasonab…
  • Olvey v. State, 609 So. 2d 640 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)
    …is probation must be reversed because they were not orally pronounced at sentencing as required by precedent from this court. Tillman v. State, 592 So. 2d 767 (Fla. 2d DCA1992); Mitchell v. State, 590 So. 2d 549 (Fla. 2d DCA1991); Williams v. State, 542 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Williams v. State, 525 So. 2d 458 (Fla. 2d DCA1988). See also Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.700. He makes this challenge without regard to any actual knowledge of the special conditions which he might have had. Because of the lack of an oral p…
  • Vinyard v. State, 586 So. 2d 1301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
    …on a daily log which you will submit to your Community Control Officer upon request. Since condition 12 was not stated at the oral pronouncement as a special condition and is not statutorily authorized, it should be stricken. See Williams v. State, 542 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). We affirm the defendant’s conviction. We direct the court to correct the judgment to reflect the defendant was adjudicated guilty under sections 893.13(1)(a) and 777.-04(1). We vacate that portion of the sentence dealing with th…

Previewing 3 of 21 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw