M.F., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1989-05-09
No. 88-106
Before NESBITT, JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.
542 So. 2d 485 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. D.T.W., 425 So. 2d 1383 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • French v. F.F.O. Fin. Grp., Inc., 651 So. 2d 727 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
    …Properties, Inc. v. Slack, 159 So. 2d 236 (Fla.1963); Hadley v. Davjoy, Inc., 613 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), review dismissed, 620 So. 2d 760 (Fla. 1993); Allen v. Port Everglades Authority, 553 So. 2d 1341 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Sunday v. Balari, 542 So. 2d 485 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Coudry v. City of Titusville, 438 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Accordingly, while we affirm the summary judgment with regard to the claim that appellees are liable for an alleged breach of contract by their subsidiar [*728] ie…
  • Olsen v. Bellsouth Telecomms., Inc., 662 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
    …em leave to file a fourth amended complaint where, as here, it appears that appellants may be able to better state a proper cause of action if allowed the opportunity. Hart Properties, Inc. v. Slack, 159 So. 2d 236, 240 (Fla.1963); Sunday v. Balari, 542 So. 2d 485 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Accordingly, we affirm the order of summary judgment on the third amended complaint, but reverse the entry of final judgment. On remand we direct the trial court to allow appellants to file their fourth amended complaint. REV…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw