FRED DOUGLAS THOMPSON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
FRED DOUGLAS THOMPSON, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
542 So. 2d 1049
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Dean v. State, 478 So. 2d 38 (Fla.1985); McCray v. State, 416 So. 2d 804 (Fla.1982); Hanks v. State, 305 So. 2d 817 (Fla.1975).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Onofre Luis Urbay v. State, 546 So. 2d 85 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)…o. 2d 1 (Fla.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 882, 103 S.Ct. 184, 74 L.Ed.2d 149 (1982). Contrary to the court’s expressed belief, the mandatory fine has not been declared unconstitutional. Failure to impose the fine requires reversal. State v. Thompson, 542 So. 2d 1049 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). The conviction and sentence to a number of years is affirmed; the refusal or failure to impose the mandatory fine is reversed, and the cause is remanded with instructions to impose the fine.…
Authorities Cited
- Ervin McCRAY v. State, 416 So. 2d 804 (Fla. 1982)
- Dean v. State, 478 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 1985)
- Hanks v. State, 305 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)