HERBERT BENN, ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
H. BRYANT SIMS, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
HERBERT BENN, ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
H. BRYANT SIMS, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
543 So. 2d 330
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The trial judge performed the function of evaluating and weighing the evidence to arrive at his findings of fact. It is not our function to reweigh the evidence or substitute our judgment for that of the trial court. The scope of our review is to determine whether such findings are supported by sufficient competent evidence. Finding such support, we affirm. See Ocean View Towers, Inc. v. First Fidelity Savings and Loan Association, 521 So. 2d 325, 326 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).
ANSTEAD, WARNER and GARRETT, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The Honorable Jonathan T. Colby v. McNEILL, 595 So. 2d 115 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)…1, 1990, that he was ready for trial. He made no motion, however, to reset the trial date. . Godwin v. State, 580 So. 2d 176 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 584 So. 2d 998 (Fla.1991); State v. A.H., 550 So. 2d 138 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Birken v. Scheer, 543 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 553 So. 2d 1166 (Fla.1989); Granade v. Ader, 530 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 541 So. 2d 1172 (Fla.1988); Brown v. State, 527 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 534 So. 2d 398 (Fla.1988); Lobik v. State, 5…
-
Thompson v. State, 615 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)…rged, the defendant waives his speedy trial right as to all charges which emanate [*741] from the same criminal episode.” Stewart v. State, 491 So. 2d 271, 272 (Fla.1986). Accord Beverly v. State, 516 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Birken v. Scheer, 543 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 553 So. 2d 1166 (Fla.1989). The speedy trial requirement is reinstated upon the filing of a motion for discharge. State v. McCrery, 429 So. 2d 739, 741 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 438 So. 2d 833 (Fla.1983). Rule 3.…
-
PNC Bank v. Smith, 225 So. 3d 294 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)…hat Bank had acted with unclean hands and, therefore, was not entitled to the requested foreclosure. As a reviewing court, we do not reweigh the evidence presented at trial nor do we substitute our judgment for that of the trial court. Benn v. Sims, 543 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). Nevertheless, “[w]here a trial court’s conclusions following a non-jury trial are based upon legal error, the standard of review is de novó.” Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Williamson, 199 So. 3d 1031, 1034 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (quoti…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Ocean View Towers, Inc. v. First Fid. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 521 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)