IRVIN J. SIEGEL, APPELLANT,
v.
LAURA SIEGEL, APPELLEE
IRVIN J. SIEGEL, APPELLANT,
LAURA SIEGEL, APPELLEE
543 So. 2d 785
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989)
Caution
Cited by 34 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
There is no showing that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the mother’s motion for modification of child support in light of the evidence of changed circumstances. Department of Health & Rehab. Servs. v. Walker, 411 So. 2d 347 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).
The issue of the husband’s equity in the marital home was never presented to the trial court and, therefore, cannot be considered on appeal. Dober v. Worrell, 401 So. 2d 1322 (Fla.1981); Sparta State Bank v. Pape, 477 So. 2d 3 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (18 total)
-
Boynton v. Milton Burglass, M.D., 590 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…ate grey area ... particularly with regard to issues of foreseeability and predictability of future dangerousness.” Lindabury v. Lindabury, 552 So. 2d 1117, 1118 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (Jorgenson, J., dissenting) (citations omitted); Fischer v. Metcalf, 543 So. 2d 785, 787 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (“Unlike other branches of medicine in which diagnoses and treatments evolve from objective, empirical, methodological foundations, ‘psychiatry is at best an inexact science, if, indeed, it is a science_’”) (citations om…1 / 2
-
Freehauf v. Sch. Bd. OF Seminole Cnty., 623 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)…make child abuse reports, contrary, to state statutes, the majority of cases in other jurisdictions as well as two other appellate courts in this state which have considered the issue, hold that no private cause of action exists. Fischer v. Metcalf, 543 So. 2d 785 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); 73 A.L.R. 4th Anno. Validity, Consequences and Application of State Statute Requiring Doctor or Other Person to Report Child Abuse § 11(b), at 782.4 We have found only one case which allowed a suit on this basis, and dictum from…
-
Hallegere (Hall) Murthy v. N. Sinha Corp., 644 So. 2d 983 (Fla. 1994)…various considerations aimed at resolving what the Legislature intended when it passed the statute in the first place.”), review dismissed, 629 So. 2d 132 (Fla.1993); Finkle v. Mayerchak, 578 So. 2d 396, 397-98 (Fla.3d DCA 1991); Fischer v. Metcalf, 543 So. 2d 785 (Fla.3d DCA 1989) (applying the criteria set forth in Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66, 95 S.Ct. 2080, 45 L.Ed.2d 26 (1975), to discern whether the legislature intended to create a cause of action when it enacted a particular statute). Although we are not b…
Previewing 3 of 18 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Chirogianis v. Anderson, 401 So. 2d 1322 (Fla. 1981)
- Sparta State Bank v. Pape, 477 So. 2d 3 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)
- Dep't OF Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. Walker, 411 So. 2d 347 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982)