VLD MANAGEMENT, INC., VLD INC. AND LAKE DOLORES UTILITIES AND CABLE SYSTEMS, INC., APPELLANTS,
v.
NELSON C. HYATT AND R. STEPHEN MILES, JR., AS TRUSTEE, ET AL., APPELLEES
VLD MANAGEMENT, INC., VLD INC. AND LAKE DOLORES UTILITIES AND CABLE SYSTEMS, INC., APPELLANTS,
NELSON C. HYATT AND R. STEPHEN MILES, JR., AS TRUSTEE, ET AL., APPELLEES
543 So. 2d 806
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
LETTS, Judge.
We affirm. As to the technical argument made in the third point on appeal, we find it to be circular and, in any event, if error it be, harmless.
AFFIRMED.
ANSTEAD and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wright v. State, 600 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)…. The written judgments and sentences, however, indicated incorrectly the sentences for these two charges were to run consecutively. Since a court’s written order of judgment and sentence must not vary from its oral pronouncement, Canale v. State, 543 So. 2d 806 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), the judgments and sentences in case number 90-03853 must be corrected to indicate that the sentence in count II is to run concurrently with the sentence in count I. Accordingly, the cause is remanded to the trial court to allow…
-
Wilcox v. State, 674 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)…ffirm the judgment and sentence. We do, however, find error in the imposition of certain costs. A written order of judgment and sentence must not vary from its oral pronouncement. Wright v. State, 600 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Canale v. State, 543 So. 2d 806 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). At the change of plea hearing, the court orally imposed $300.00 in court costs. The “Judgment for Fine and Costs,” however, reflects a total of $473.50 in costs imposed. On remand, this amount should be corrected to comport with…