JOHN SINGLETARY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOHN SINGLETARY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
543 So. 2d 847
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the several appellate points we affirm defendant’s conviction because no reversible error has been demonstrated. However, we reverse that portion of the judgment imposing costs on the defendant because defendant was not afforded notice and an opportunity to be heard at the time of such assessment. We remand for a new hearing thereon after notice to the defendant. See Mays v. State, 519 So. 2d 618 (Fla.1988).
Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded with instructions as concerns the imposition of costs.
DELL, WALDEN and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Travelers Commercial Ins. Co. v. Harrington, 154 So. 3d 1106 (Fla. 2014)…So. 2d 399, 400-02 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (explaining that the UM statute does not require an automobile policy to treat vehicles as both insured for purposes of liability coverage and uninsured for purposes of UM coverage); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Baker, 543 So. 2d 847, 850 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989) (“[A] vehicle cannot be transformed from an insured vehicle into an uninsured vehicle simply because liability coverage was barred due to a valid enforceable household exclusion in the same policy[.]”). Accordingly, we conc…
-
Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. v. Kitteridge S. Fitzgibbon, 568 So. 2d 113 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)…o. 2d 1172 (Fla.1977); Smith v. Valley Forge Insurance Co., 566 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Brixius v. Allstate Insurance Co., 549 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), jurisdiction accepted, 557 So. 2d 866 (Fla.1990); Allstate Insurance Co. v. Baker, 543 So. 2d 847 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 554 So. 2d 1167 (Fla.1989); Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wells, 507 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Orston v. Allstate Insurance Co., 502 So. 2d 526 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 511 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 1987); Larsen v. Stat…
-
The Travelers Ins. Cos. v. Chandler, 569 So. 2d 1337 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)…that she owned, which was driven by an uninsured friend, was not entitled to UM coverage, because the policy excluded BIL coverage for injuries sustained by the named insured), review pending, 557 So. 2d 866 (Fla. 1990); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Baker, 543 So. 2d 847 (Fla. 4th DCA) (daughter was not entitled to benefits under her parents’ policy, because household exclusion precluded her from recovering BIL benefits, and insured-vehicle exclusion barred her from recovering UM benefits), review denied sub nom. De…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Mays v. State, 519 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 1988)