IN RE AMENDMENT TO FLORIDA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION-RULE 2.125(B)(1)

Citator

Cited By (37 total)

• State v. Callaway, 658 So. 2d 983 (Fla. 1995)
  …orized by law, that the plea was given involuntarily, or that the judgment or sentence is otherwise subject to collateral attack.” .The two-year window is derived from the two-year time limit for filing motions under rule 3.850. See Adams v. State, 543 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 1989).…
• Dixon v. State, 730 So. 2d 265 (Fla. 1999)
  …e already final. Our decision to utilize the date of the issuance of the mandate in the case in which we announce retroactivity as the basis for calculating a cut-off period for posteonviction claims is consistent with the intent of Adams v. State, 543 So. 2d 1244, 1247 (Fla.1989), that defendants must file rule 3.850 motions within two years of any fundamental change in law. Only when we decide the issue of retro-activity do we announce whether the change of law has “fundamental significance” and accordingly…
• Hardwick v. Dugger, 648 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 1994)
  …s statements regarding the victim and to move for a mistrial after emotional outbursts by the victim’s cousin. Booth claims are procedurally barred in postconviction proceedings if not objected to at trial or raised on direct appeal. Adams v. State, 543 So. 2d 1244,1249 (Fla.1989). Thus, we address only the ineffective assistance aspects of this claim. Even if counsel’s performance was deficient in this regard, we find no prejudice. Most of the evidence at issue (prosecutor’s emphasis of the victim’s youth and…