CHARLES ROBERT HOLLOMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
JOELLA FINNEY HOLLOMAN, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Discovery Obligations cases and more on FLexlaw
DANIEL, Judge.
This appeal has been taken from the final order of the trial court which adjudicated the parties’ rights and obligations concerning the support and custody of their daughter, Sarah. The sole issue raised on appeal is whether the trial court erred in ordering Charles Robert Holloman to submit to the court and to his former wife, Joella Finney Holloman, periodic affidavits disclosing his personal financial status as well as the financial status of his professional corporation. Charles contends that the order is improper because it imposes upon him a continuing obligation to provide discovery when in fact there is no litigation pending between the parties. We agree and therefore we reverse that portion of the trial court’s order directing Charles to submit periodic financial affidavits. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.280.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part. .
ORFINGER and COBB, JJ., concur. •
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Page v. Fernandina Harbor Joint Venture, 608 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)…e the equitable owner of the Improvements and, therefore, be treated as the legal owner for purposes of ad valorem taxation. See, e.g., Bancroft Investment Corporation v. Jacksonville, 157 Fla. 546, 27 So. 2d 162 (1946); Parker v. Hertz Corporation, 544 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Hialeah, Inc. v. Dade County, 490 So. 2d 998 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) [rev. denied, 500 So. 2d 544 (Fla.1986)]; Marathon Air Services, Inc. v. Higgs, 575 So. 2d 1340 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). Having done so, the Court concludes that plaintif…
-
First Union Nat'l Bank OF Fla. & Brevard Cnty. v. Ford, 636 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)…6.199(2)(a) add collateral support for our conclusion that in determining the [*527] taxability of property in this state, courts should look through form to the substance of who is the beneficial owner of the property. In Parker v. The Hertz Corp., 544 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), the lessee, Hertz, challenged the assessment of ad valorem taxes on the improvements Hertz had built and was using in its car rental business. It had leased the real property from the Aviation Authority at the Tampa Airport. The…
-
Lewis Y. and Betty T. Ward v. Brown, 919 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)…n reading of the section indicates that it does not address 99-year term leases, with automatic renewals for additional 99-year periods in perpetuity, or any other circumstances from which equitable ownership may be found. See Parker v. Hertz Corp., 544 So. 2d 249, 251 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) (rejecting Hertz’s argument that because it had a lease less than 100 years, it cannot be deemed an owner for property tax purposes; “we do not perceive the sweep of the word ‘owned’ appearing in section 196.199(2)(b) to be m…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence