GERALD J. TOBIN, APPELLANT,
v.
ROMAN COMPTE AND MARTA UNHJEM, APPELLEES
GERALD J. TOBIN, APPELLANT,
ROMAN COMPTE AND MARTA UNHJEM, APPELLEES
544 So. 2d 341
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Cone Bros. Const. Co. v. Moore, 141 Fla. 420, 193 So. 288 (1940); Richmond v. Stockton, Whatley, Bavin & Company, 430 So. 2d 571 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State of Fla. ex rel. Eduardo Cantera v. Dist. Court OF Appeal, 555 So. 2d 360 (Fla. 1990)…jurisdiction to enter the subsequent order. Thus, Cantera argued that the notice of appeal should have been filed no later than thirty days from November 15, 1988. In a split decision, the Third District Court of Appeal denied the motion to dismiss. 544 So. 2d 341. The case turns on whether the trial judge had the authority to vacate the order denying rehearing. Ironically, a recent decision of the same Third District Court of Appeal suggests the lack of such authority. In Capital Bank v. Knuck, 537 So. 2d 6…
-
Schere v. Z.F., Inc., 578 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
Authorities Cited
- Cone Bros. Constr. Co. v. Malinda W. Moore (Mrs. A. J. Moore) et vir., 141 Fla. 420 (Fla. 1940)
- Richmond v. Stockton, 430 So. 2d 571 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)