PEDRO DE JESUS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1989-06-13
No. 89-738
Before BARKDULL, JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ.
544 So. 2d 341 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 463 So. 2d 207 (Fla.1985); O’Callaghan v. State, 461 So. 2d 1354 (Fla.1984); Ferro v. State, 488 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Anderson v. State, 467 So. 2d 781 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …jurisdiction to enter the subsequent order. Thus, Cantera argued that the notice of appeal should have been filed no later than thirty days from November 15, 1988. In a split decision, the Third District Court of Appeal denied the motion to dismiss. 544 So. 2d 341. The case turns on whether the trial judge had the authority to vacate the order denying rehearing. Ironically, a recent decision of the same Third District Court of Appeal suggests the lack of such authority. In Capital Bank v. Knuck, 537 So. 2d 6…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw