MICHAEL WHITEHEAD, APPELLANT,
v.
RICHARD L. DUGGER, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, AND STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEES

Fla. 4th DCA | 1989-06-07
No. 88-3084
ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.
544 So. 2d 1070 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s dismissal of this petition for writ of habeas corpus on the authority of State v. Broom, 523 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). If petitioner is entitled to any relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 or 3.850, motions for such relief must be addressed to the trial court in Dade County which passed sentence upon appellant.

ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Leichtman v. Singletary, 674 So. 2d 889 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
    …post-conviction relief, if appellant is entitled to any relief under rules 3.800 or 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, such motions must be addressed to the trial court in Dade county which passed sentence upon him. See Whitehead v. Dugger, 544 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). Accordingly, the appealed order is reversed with direction to vacate for lack of jurisdiction without prejudice to appellant to seek other relief in the appropriate judicial circuit. GLICKSTEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur. . H…
  • Patterson v. State, 664 So. 2d 31 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
    …case, Defendant’s issues of involuntariness of plea and ineffective assistance of trial counsel are among those issues that should be raised by a motion for post-conviction relief, not a petition for habeas corpus. See generally Whitehead v. Dugger, 544 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); see also Brown v. Wainwright, 383 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980) (illegal sentence should be raised by motion for post-conviction relief and not petition for writ of habeas corpus). Defendant concedes that he was seeking post-co…
  • Nourachi v. First Am. Title Ins. Co., 44 So. 3d 602 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)
    …property, the title company is obligated to answer for any defect that is a matter of public record which is not excepted by the policy. See Parker v. Ward, 614 So. 2d 975, 977 (Ala.1992); Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. D.S.C. of Newark Enters., Inc., 544 So. 2d 1070, 1072 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). This rule has been found to apply even where the insured is alleged to have had actual knowledge of a material defect in title at the time of closing. L. Smirlock Realty Corp. v. Title Guarantee Co., 52 N.Y.2d 179, 487 N.Y…
    1 / 3

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw