DONNA WOODS AND ROGER WOODS, HER HUSBAND, APPELLANTS,

v.

DANIEL B. ASHLIN, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• D.G. v. State, 661 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
  …yelling and cursing. On the other hand, there are cases holding that the use of mere words can be a violation of section 843.02 when a suspect provides false information to a police officer during a valid arrest or Terry1 stop. See Rumph v. State, 544 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Caines v. State, 500 So. 2d 728 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). This rule, however, does not obligate a person to give his or her correct identity to an officer unless that person is legally detained. Steele v. State, 537 So. 2d 711 (Fla. 5…
• Hildagarde Simmons v. State, 551 So. 2d 607 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)
  …effective October 1, 1987, to provide, in sum, that in robbery, the force used in the course of taking property may be subsequent to the taking if the force “and the act of taking constitute a continuous series of acts or events.” In Rumph v. State, 544 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989), the defendant used force as he fled with stolen jeans and his conviction of robbery was affirmed on the basis of the amended statute. Here, however, the taking was completed without any use of force and the property abandoned be…
• Thomas v. State, 36 So. 3d 853 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)
  …402 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) (“[T]he continuity of [the shoplifter’s] progression from the store to his forceful act against the [pursuing] officer with his car outside the store justified submission of the robbery offense to the jury.”); Rumph v. State, 544 So. 2d 1150, 1151-52 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) (“[A shoplifter’s] use of force to shove [a store employee] out of his way and into the door as he fled with [stolen property] constitutes the use of force in flight after the taking and provides the evidence to sustain…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Varn Prods. Co., Inc. v. Hammermill Paper Co., Inc., 544 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
• Woods v. McDONALD'S Corp., 544 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)