GORDON FERGUSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1989-06-28
No. 88-1754
SHIVERS and JOANOS, JJ., concur.
545 So. 2d 505 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Judge.

ERVIN, Judge.

Appellant appeals his written sentence, which varies from that pronounced in open court. We remand for the purpose of correcting the written sentence to conform to the oral sentence, because the oral pronouncement controls. Timmons v. State, 453 So. 2d 143, 144 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

SHIVERS and JOANOS, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Collins v. State, 546 So. 2d 123 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
    …addition, as it appears that several of the written sentences are inconsistent with the oral pronouncement of those sentences, we direct the trial court on remand to correct the written sentences to conform to the oral sentences. Ferguson v. State, 545 So. 2d 505 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Timmons v. State, 453 So. 2d 143, 144 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). REVERSED and REMANDED. SHIVERS, C.J. and JOANOS, J., concur.…
  • Brown v. State, 599 So. 2d 225 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
    …s therefore remanded with directions to correct the written sentence so as to conform to the oral pronouncement. Timmons v. State, 453 So. 2d 143, 144 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Collins v. State, 546 So. 2d 123, 123 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Ferguson v. State, 545 So. 2d 505, 505 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Camp v. State, 501 So. 2d 81, 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). Appellee’s motion to dismiss is DENIED; appellant’s sentence in Case No. 89-2702 is VACATED and the case REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw