JUSTO CARABALLO, ET UX., APPELLANTS,
v.
RIVERHOUSE APARTMENTS CO., ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1989-07-05
No. 89-357
Before HUBBART, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.
545 So. 2d 516 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. City of Boca Raton v. Mattef, 91 So. 2d 644 (Fla.1956) (en banc); Stewart v. Texas Co., 67 So. 2d 653 (Fla.1953); Florida Power and Light Co. v. Lively, 465 So. 2d 1270 (Fla. 3d DCA) (en banc), pet. for review denied, 476 So. 2d 674 (Fla.1985); Dougherty v. Hernando County, 419 So. 2d 679 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Zipkin v. Rubin Construction Co., 418 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Marks v. Delcastillo, 386 So. 2d 1259 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); State ex rel. Boyles v. Sinter, 363 So. 2d 357 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Crews v. Emmett Crews, 629 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)
    …jection to Request to Enter Premises.” We treat appellee’s brief as a confession of error. See Lambrix v. Dugger, 586 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (citing Wiley v. State, 578 So. 2d 903 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)); Boggs v. Farm Credit Bank of Columbia, 545 So. 2d 516 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). The appellant seeks appellate attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to a marital settlement agreement incorporated into a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. The agreement reads in part: Should either party breach the ter…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw