FLORIDA PATIENT'S COMPENSATION FUND, MAX W. WILSON, M.D., AND WILSON, MEIGS, MASTRIOLE & SUTHERLAND, M.D.'S, P.A., APPELLANTS,
v.
DORIS WASSER, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JACOB WASSER, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Patient's Compensation Fund is not liable for attorney's fees when the healthcare provider's underlying insurance policy language is sufficient to cover such fees. The trial court erred in holding the Fund responsible for fees exceeding the primary carrier's coverage.
A wrongful death action resulted in a jury verdict and awards for the estate, the plaintiff, attorney's fees, and costs. The trial court clarified the…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Insurance Policy Provisions cases and more on FLexlaw
RIVKIND, LEONARD, Associate Judge.
Appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted. The opinion of March 15, 1989, is withdrawn, and we substitute the following opinion.
Appellee, Doris Wasser (Wasser), as personal representative, brought a wrongful death action against appellants, Max W. Wilson, M.D. (Wilson), Wilson, Meigs, Mas-triole & Sutherland, M.D.’s, P.A. (Wilson), and Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund (Fund), alleging medical malpractice. The jury returned a verdict awarding $4,367.05 to the estate and $90,000 to Wasser. Attorney’s fees, in the amount of $101,700, and costs, in the amount of $7,753.80, were awarded to Wasser. These fees and costs were imposed by the trial court against Wilson and the Fund. The trial court clarified the final judgment to hold that the Fund was responsible for that portion of the judgment exceeding $100,000, Wilson’s underlying insurance coverage.
The main issue to be decided by these consolidated appeals is whether the Fund or Wilson’s primary carrier is responsible for Wasser’s attorney fees. The parties agreed at oral argument that the language of the policy provisions of the primary carrier for Wilson was identical to the provisions we interpreted in Sitomer. Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Sitomer, 524 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). All parties concur that the Fund is not liable for legal fees according to Sitomer. We held in Sitomer that the language of the ' health care provider’s underlying coverage was “sufficient to include the payment of attorney’s fees,” thereby precluding liability to the Fund. Sitomer, 524 So. 2d at 676.
In deference to the trial judge, the final judgment entered in this case was prior to the publication of Sitomer and, upon agreement of the parties, we have had the benefit of Wilson’s insurance policy which was not presented to the trial court. On the authority of Sitomer, we conclude that Wilson’s carrier is liable for the legal fees of Wasser and therefore reverse the final judgment entered against the Fund.
Appellants also contend that the trial court erred when it failed to limit the attorney’s fees award to the contingency fee agreement between the plaintiff and her attorneys. The trial court found that the fee agreement called for an award of reasonable attorney’s fees. We agree and affirm the trial court on this issue.
AFFIRMED, in part, and REVERSED, in part.
DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Orlando Reg'l Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Boleslaus J. Chmielewski, 573 So. 2d 876 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)…9), affirmed in part, quashed in part, 557 So. 2d 863 (Fla.1990); Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. Poole, 547 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), rev. denied, 558 So. 2d 19 (Fla.1990); Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Wasser, 545 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), affirmed in part, quashed in part sub nom. Wilson v. Wasser, 562 So. 2d 339 (Fla.1990). The absence of those three little words is fatal to the cross-appellants’ position. In Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.…
-
Inacio v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 550 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)…ven though it may exceed the agreed percentage of the recovery. Tallahasee Memorial Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. Poole, 547 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA, 1989); Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Moxley, 545 So. 2d 922 (Fla. 4th DCA), on reh’g, 545 So. 2d 924 (1989); Quanstrom v. Standard Guaranty Insurance Co., 519 So. 2d 1135 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). For the cogent reasons expressed by the United States Supreme Court in Blanchard v. Bergeron, 489 U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 939, 103 L.Ed.2d 67 (1989), and in the case…
-
Max W. Wilson, M.D. v. Wasser, 562 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 1990)…PER CURIAM. We have for review Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Wasser, 545 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). Having accepted review of Florida Patient’s Compensation [*340] Fund v. Sitomer, 524 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), quashed sub nom. Smith v. Sitomer, 550 So. 2d 461 (Fla.1989), which conflicted with other district court decisi…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Fla. Patient's Comp. Fund v. Sitomer, 524 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)