EDWIN ORTIZ, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Sarasota Bev. Co. v. Johnson, 551 So. 2d 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
  …r types of cases. While most recent Florida cases continue to verbalize the existence of such continued discretion in the trial courts in practical application, in my opinion, that discretion has been eliminated. See Dad’s Properties, Inc. v. Lucas, 545 So. 2d 926 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Xerographies, Inc. v. Thomas, 537 So. 2d 140 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Florida Pest Control & Chemical Co. v. Thomas, 520 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Twenty Four Collection, Inc. v. Keller, 389 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), rev.…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Myles Kenneth Leighton v. First Universal Lending, LLC, 925 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
  …on information Leighton stole from First Universal. It also claims that an injunction may bind non-parties identified with parties in interest, in privity with them, represented by them, or subject to their control. See Dad’s Props., Inc. v. Lucas, 545 So. 2d 926 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). There is no doubt that a court can enjoin others who were not parties to the non-compete agreement. However, those parties must receive notice and have an opportunity to be heard. Sheoah Highlands, 837 So. 2d at 583. Here, Netwo…
• Bauer v. Dilib, Inc., 16 So. 3d 318 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)
  …d have an opportunity to be heard.’ ” USI Ins. Servs. of Fla. Inc. v. Pettineo, 987 So. 2d 763, 767 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (citing Leighton v. First Universal Lending, LLC, 925 So. 2d 462, 465 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)); see also Dad’s Props., Inc. v. Lucas, 545 So. 2d 926, 928 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) (“[individuals and entities may be enjoined from aiding and abetting a cove-nantor in violating a covenant not to compete.”); W. Shore Rest. Corp. v. Turk, 101 So. 2d 123, 129 (Fla.1958) (“[T]he rule that a stranger to a cove…

Authorities Cited

• Kaplan v. State, 451 So. 2d 1386 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)