ERNEST SMITH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A conviction for resisting arrest without violence must be reversed if the record lacks competent proof that the underlying arrest was legally valid.
An officer arrested Smith based on an active capias for unlawful assemblage. Smith was subsequently convicted of resisting arrest without violence. Th…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Resisting Arrest Without Violence cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The defendant has appealed the judgment of conviction for resisting arrest without violence, a violation of section 843.02, Florida Statutes (1987).
The arresting officer was on routine patrol when he observed Smith and two companions waving at cars from a street corner in an area known for drug activity in Fort Lauderdale. The officer asked Smith and his companions for identification and ran a check on them through the police radio dispatcher. The radio check turned up an active capias for unlawful assemblage on Smith and pursuant to this information, Smith was arrested. As a result of resisting the arrest, he was charged with a violation of section 843.01, Florida Statutes, resisting arrest with violence. At the conclusion of the trial, the court determined that the evidence would support a conviction of a misdemeanor for resisting arrest without violence under section 843.02, Florida Statutes (1987).
Under section 843.02 the proof of the legality of an arrest is an essential element of the crime and the prosecution has the burden of establishing this element. Lee v. State, 368 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
Here the record is devoid of competent proof that the capias for unlawful assemblage was legally valid at the time of Smith’s arrest. Without such proof, the state did not establish that the arrest was lawfully made and therefore failed to prove an essential element of the crime for which Smith was convicted. Because the state failed to carry its burden of proving every essential element of the crime charged, Purifoy v. State, 359 So. 2d 446 (Fla.1978); Kilbee v. State, 53 So. 2d 533 (Fla.1951), the conviction for resisting arrest without violence must be reversed. Lee v. State; Dean v. State, 466 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).
REVERSED.
WALDEN, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
D.A. v. State, 636 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)…d, 378 So. 2d 349 (Fla.1979). The officers’ testimony that the appellant was arrested under a valid pickup order, without the order itself introduced into evidence, was not competent proof that the order was indeed legally valid. See Smith v. State, 546 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). Based on the record and the State’s concession, we reverse the appellant’s adjudication of delinquency.…
-
K.E.A. v. State, 802 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)…as past recollection recorded.2 Thus, the state failed to carry its burden of proving every essential element of the crime charged. See Purifoy v. State, 359 So. 2d 446 (Fla.1978); Kilbee v. State, 53 So. 2d 533 (Fla.1951); see also Smith v. State, 546 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). Accordingly, the adjudication of delinquency is reversed. . Section 90.803(5), provides: Recorded recollection. — A memorandum or record concerning a matter about which a witness once had knowledge, but now has insufficient r…
-
Romance Jones v. State, 640 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)…at the officer was “in the lawful execution of any legal duty.” § 843.02, Fla.Stat. (1991).1 This element is established by proof of either probable cause or a valid warrant. See In the Interest of 560 So. 2d 805 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Smith v. State, 546 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Dean v. State, 466 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Here, there was a stipulation that the detective had probable cause to arrest the defendant. As such, a prima facie ease was established and a judgment of acquittal was properl…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Purifoy v. State, 359 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 1978)
- LEE v. State, 368 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- Kilbee v. State, 53 So.2d 533 (Fla. 1951)
- Dean v. State, 466 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)