JACK GRISS, PETITIONER,
v.
HONORABLE GISELA CARDONNE, CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
JACK GRISS, PETITIONER,
HONORABLE GISELA CARDONNE, CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
546 So. 2d 1171
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Jack Griss petitions this court for a writ of prohibition to prevent the trial court from unsealing his criminal record for use in a civil action arising out of the same occurrence. In accordance with our holding in Sussex Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ruiz, 508 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), we grant the petition and vacate the order of the trial court unsealing Griss’s criminal record. See also, § 943.058, Fla.Stat. (Supp.1988). We assume it will be unnecessary for us to issue the writ,
Remanded,
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Resha v. Tucker, 600 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)…. Having otherwise failed to demonstrate a basis for unsealing Tucker’s records, Resha is not entitled to have the records unsealed simply because of his status as a plaintiff in a civil action arising out of the same occurrence. Griss v. Cardonne, 546 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. 3d DCA1989); Sussex Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ruiz, 508 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 3d DCA1987); City of West Palm Beach v. Meredith, 473 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 4th DCA1985); and Walton v. Turlington, 444 So. 2d 1082 (Fla. 1st DCA1984). Katie Tucker’s petition…
-
Riggs v. State, 588 So. 2d 1019 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)…circumstances alone are used as the basis for contempt, and where the intent of the defendant is unclear and lack of intent is expressed by him, such a finding is essential. See Stevens v. State, 547 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); State v. Butter, 546 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Harmon v. State, 445 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 453 So. 2d 45 (Fla.1984); Thomson v. State, 398 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). The second error is that the court first adjudicated Riggs of contempt and found him guil…
Authorities Cited
- Sussex Mut. Ins. Co. a/s/o Daisy Concepcion v. Ruiz, 508 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)