REGINALD CORNETT, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• GAY v. State, 607 So. 2d 454 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
  …trol” within the meaning of the Chimel case. New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454, 462, 101 S.Ct. 2860, 2864, 69 L.Ed.2d 768 (1981). Moreover, the scope and authority of Belton is not limited to the search of the contents of automobiles. Stone v. State, 547 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 4th DCA1989) (en banc). The Belton court also rejected the theory that the actual ability of the arrestee to reach a weapon or destroy evidence is the determinative consideration in deciding whether a search incident to an arrest is valid. Sav…
• State v. Crawford, 565 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)
  …to that arrest. See State v. Boulia, 522 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). The billfold inside the purse was within the scope of the authority to search. See United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218, 94 S.Ct. 467, 38 L.Ed.2d 427 (1973); Stone v. State, 547 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989) (en banc); 2 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure §§ 5.2(a)-(c). Reversed. DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.…
• State v. Brooks, 553 So. 2d 712 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
  …threw it in his patrol car. The officers could not testify that appellee was even present when the suitcase was searched, but it was not searched at the time or place of the arrest of appellee several blocks from the bus station. In Stone v. State, 547 So. 2d 158, 162 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), this court stated: ... a search that is not remote in time or place should be deemed to be a reasonable intrusion if the object of the search had been within the defendant’s immediate area of control just prior to his dete…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Stone v. State, 547 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)