JOSEPH SERGE PAUL, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOSEPH SERGE PAUL, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
547 So. 2d 295
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989)
Caution
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Hill v. State, 477 So. 2d 553 (Fla.1985); Bundy v. State, 471 So. 2d 9 (Fla.1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 894, 107 S.Ct. 295, 93 L.Ed.2d 269 (1986); Wright v. State, 427 So. 2d 326 (Fla.1983); State v. Tait, 387 So. 2d 338 (Fla.1980); Rowe v. State, 128 Fla. 394, 174 So. 820, 821 (1937); Fridovich v. State, 489 So. 2d 143, 146 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 496 So. 2d 142 (Fla.1986); McCall v. State, 463 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Singleton v. State, 422 So. 2d 1082 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); State v. Stell, 407 So. 2d 642, 643 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); § 90.403, Fla.Stat. (1987); Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.220(d)(1).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jackson v. State, 736 So. 2d 77 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…of any vehicle identification numbers); S.P.L., 512 So. 2d at 1154 (concerning moped with broken ignition, missing license tag, and partially removed serial number in defendant’s possession within a few hours after taking from owner); D.G. v. State, 547 So. 2d 295 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (involving automobile that showed signs of forced entry and physical damage in defendant’s possession within 24 hours after taking). Jackson was not caught in a lie while giving an improbable story. Cf. J.J. v. State, 463 So. 2d 1…
-
Bertone v. State, 870 So. 2d 923 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)…erson on notice” that they were stolen. Periu v. State, 490 So. 2d 1327, 1329 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (involving a car with a windshield in a “smashed-up condition” combined with the absence of any vehicle identification numbers); see also D.G. v. State, 547 So. 2d 295 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (where automobile showed signs of forced entry and physical damage in defendant’s possession within twenty-four hours after the taking). Bertone was not caught in a lie while giving an improbable story. See J.J. v. State, 463 So.…
-
Youngs v. State, 736 So. 2d 85 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…on after the theft is significant. Unexplained possession of stolen property in the early morning, after a nighttime theft, is another facet of proof, in addition to the section 812.022(2) inference, which supports the conviction. See D.G. v. State, 547 So. 2d 295, 296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); S.P.L. v. State, 512 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). This case is distinguishable from Valdez v. State, 492 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). In that case, the defendant offered an “unrefuted, exculpatory, and not unreasonabl…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited (12 total)
- Hill v. State, 477 So. 2d 553 (Fla. 1985)
- Bundy v. State, 471 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1985)
- State v. Tait, 387 So. 2d 338 (Fla. 1980)
- Bundy v. Florida, 479 U.S. 894 (U.S. 1986)
- State v. Stell, 407 So. 2d 642 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
- Rowe v. State, 128 Fla. 394 (Fla. 1937)
- McCALL v. State, 463 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
- Fridovich v. State, 489 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
- Meyers v. State, 427 So. 2d 326 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
- Wright v. State, 427 So. 2d 326 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)