LAWRENCE MCHUGH AND JANET MCHUGH, APPELLANTS,
v.
DOUGLAS KENYON, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a Taiwanese manufacturer can be subject to personal jurisdiction in Florida under the long-arm statute when its products are placed into the stream of commerce and are reasonably expected to be purchased in the state.
An appellant was injured by a defective ladder purchased in Florida. The ladder was designed and manufactured by the appellee, a Taiwanese firm that c…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Stream Of Commerce cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We deny appellee’s motion for rehearing. However, we withdraw the opinion issued on June 28, 1989 and substitute the following corrected opinion:
This is an appeal from an order granting a motion to dismiss a defendant, Ching Luen Enterprises Company, Ltd., for lack of personal jurisdiction. Appellant was injured when a ladder he was using broke. The ladder had been purchased at Home Depot. The retailer had acquired it from a national distributor. The appellee is a Taiwanese firm that designed and manufactured the product. We reverse.
The appellee conducts no business, has no salesmen or distributors, and has no other ties in Florida or the United States. Nevertheless, there is jurisdiction over the defendant under the long arm statute, section 48.193, Florida Statutes (1985), where the appellee’s products have been placed into the stream of commerce and there is a reasonable expectation that large numbers will be purchased here. E.g., Louis Winer Co. v. San Francisco Mercantile Co., 501 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). See also Ford Motor Co. v. Atwood Vacuum Machine Co., 392 So. 2d 1305 (Fla.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 901, 101 S.Ct. 3024, 69 L.Ed.2d 401 (1981).
A manufacturer that produces hundreds of thousands of product units that are distributed over a five-year period in the United States, of which at least 6,000 were marketed in Florida, should reasonably anticipate being sued in this state in connection with product defects causing injury. It does not offend traditional notions of fair play and justice to permit the manufacturer to be sued in the fourth most populous state in the country under such circumstances. The order granting the motion is reversed. We remand for further ' proceedings.
WALDEN, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wetzel v. Fisherman's Wharf OF Pompano Beach, Inc., 771 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)…of 3,794 cases of class C fireworks, which are products closely related to the type of firework causing the injury, established sufficient minimum contacts with Florida so as to render Kwongyuen amenable to suit in .this state. See McHugh v. Kenyon, 547 So. 2d 318, 319 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Shoei Safety Helmet Corp. v. Conlee, 409 So. 2d 39, 41 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Kravitz v. Gebrueder Pletscher Druckgusswaremfabrik, 442 So. 2d 985, 987 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Murante v. Pedro Land, Inc., 761 F.Supp. 786, 789 (S.D…
-
Imerys Talc Am., Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson, 262 So. 3d 799 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)
-
Honda Motor Co., Ltd. v. Stearns, 596 So. 2d 173 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Schlunk, 486 U.S. 694, 108 S.Ct. 2104, 100 L.Ed.2d 722 (1988); McHugh v. Kenyon, 547 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 557 So. 2d 866 (Fla.1989).…
Authorities Cited
- Jaffer v. Miami Beach Redev. Agency, 392 So. 2d 1305 (Fla. 1980)
- Atwood Vacuum Mach. Co. v. Ford Motor Co., 452 U.S. 901 (U.S. 1981)
- Prenzler v. Pike, 452 U.S. 901 (U.S. 1981)
- Louis Winer Co., Inc. v. SAN Francisco Mercantile Co., Inc., 501 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)