I. LAWRENCE BRIL, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
SUSAN G. FURMAN, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1989-08-15
No. 88-2593
Before NESBITT, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.
548 So. 2d 730 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Counsel for respective parties have conceded that the money judgment awarded Ms. Furman was miscalculated. Consequently, the final judgment is vacated with directions for the trial court to reduce the principal sum of the judgment in the amount of $419, and to recalculate interest accordingly. In all other respects, the judgment, as modified, is affirmed.

Affirmed in part, vacated in part and remanded.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • The Ivens Corp. v. Cohen, 560 So. 2d 1352 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
    …lculate damages. See Ocean Ridge Yacht Club Associates v. Atlantic Elec. Constr. Co., 546 So. 2d 804 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). When it does so, the trial court should reconsider the conceded overage in its calculation of the damage award. Bril v. Furman, 548 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Reversed and remanded to the trial court for recalculation of damages. Reversed and remanded.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw