GERALD L. BIDLOFSKY, APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, APPELLEE
GERALD L. BIDLOFSKY, APPELLANT,
DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, APPELLEE
548 So. 2d 780
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant’s petition for writ of certiorari, construed as a petition for review of non-final agency action, is denied.
BOOTH, JOANOS and MINER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Stroman v. State, 837 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)…ed pursuant to a rule 3.800(a) motion is illegal if it imposes a kind of punishment that no judge under the entire body of sentencing statutes could possibly inflict under any set of factual circumstances. Previously, this court, in Butler v. State, 548 So. 2d 780, 781 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), held that a prison sentence imposed partly concurrent with and partly consecutive to another prison sentence is illegal since a prisoner has the right to serve a sentence at one stretch, rather than in bits and pieces. In th…
-
Gordon v. State, 960 So. 2d 31 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)…ence. We note that the time Gordon spent in jail from September 29, 2004 to October 5, 2004 was not a sentence that violates the rule that a defendant must serve his sentence in one stretch rather than in bits and pieces. See, e.g., Butler v. State, 548 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Rozmestor v. State, 381 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Rather, after the court found Gordon guilty of criminal contempt, it exercised its discretion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.550 to have him taken into custody.…