RONNIE A. STONEKING, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RONNIE A. STONEKING, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
548 So. 2d 1187
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. Cassoday v. State, 237 So. 2d 146 (Fla.1970); Dorch v. State, 483 So. 2d 851 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
SHIVERS, C.J., and WENTWORTH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Psychiatric Assocs. v. Edward A. Siegel, M.D., 610 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 1992)…nt’s costs. Psychiatric Associates appealed the trial court’s holding that the bond requirement violated Siegel’s right of access. The district court affirmed the trial court’s holding and adopted Judge Anstead’s dissent in Guerrero v. Humana, Inc., 548 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). In Sittig v. Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center, the district court held that section 395.0115(5)(b), as applied to the facts, violated Dr. Armanda Sittig’s (Sittig) right of access to courts. The record shows that in…
-
Smith v. Neil A. Fisher, M.D., 965 So. 2d 205 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)…-26. The statute does not require the posting of security regardless of the merits of the lawsuit. Cf. Psychiatric Assocs., 610 So. 2d at 425; Cmty. Hosp. of the Palm Beaches, 579 So. 2d at 304 (relying on dissent in [*211] Guerrero v. Humana, Inc., 548 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. 4th DCA1989)). For these reasons we hold that section 68.098 satisfies the second Kluger test and affirm.6 STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur. .The following list is a sample of the lawsuits filed by Smith: 1. Smith v. State, 765 So. 2d 718 (Fla…
-
Cmty. Hosp. OF THE Palm Beaches, Inc. v. Luis Guerrero, M.D., 579 So. 2d 304 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)…ing parties’ potential attorney’s fees in order to litigate. Here, the amount of bond in question is $150,000.00. The reasoning supporting the trial court decision is fully expressed in Judge Anstead’s dissenting opinion in Guerrero v. Humana, Inc., 548 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), adopted by the First District in Siegel. Nothing is to be gained by repeating it here. Therefore, the trial court order does not violate the essential requirements of law and the petition is denied. GUNTHER, STONE and GARRET…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Cassoday v. State, 237 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 1970)
- Norvel L. Dorch v. State, 483 So. 2d 851 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)