DONALD SPANN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1989-07-18
No. 88-15
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
549 So. 2d 200 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Rousseau, 509 So. 2d 281 (Fla.1987); Casteel v. State, 498 So. 2d 1249 (Fla.1986); Scurry v. State, 489 So. 2d 25 (Fla.1986); Moreira v. State, 500 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Martin Paving Co. v. United Pac. Ins. Co., 646 So. 2d 268 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)
    …s, Martin did not find the bond in time to timely assert its claim. The current statutory scheme plainly does not contemplate that the principal and surety can defeat a payment bond claim by avoiding detection. Cf. Suchman v. National Hauling, Inc., 549 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). The amended statutory procedure is simple enough for the surety and principal to follow in order to insure the coveted protections of subsection (2) of 255.05. If they cannot follow the procedure, they cannot expect the claimant…
  • Trump Endeavor 12 LLC v. Fernich, Inc., 216 So. 3d 704 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)
    …ractor in NTO because the owner failed to file a NOC identifying the correct contractor, and this material omission caused the subcontractor to detrimentally rely upon erroneous building department records.) See also, Suchman v. Nat’l Hauling, Inc., 549 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (holding NTO was valid, despite failure to deliver a copy of the NTO to the general contractor, because owner failed to file a NOC identifying that general contractor). Substantial Compliance Nevertheless, the absence of detrime…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw