J.D., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1989-08-08
No. 88-1918
Before NESBITT, LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.
549 So. 2d 206 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Gilbert v. State, 347 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • MacHin v. State, 867 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)
    …ghbor and close friend.1 Given this credibility determination, it was appropriate to deny the post-conviction motion insofar as it depended on [*515] Mr. Rodriguez’ testimony. See Butler v. State, 807 So. 2d 88, 89 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Fica v. State, 549 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). The defendant contended that his wife should have been called as an alibi witness. The court found the wife to be a credible witness. However, the court also concluded that the wife could only have testified about the time at wh…
  • J.G. v. State, 555 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
    …PER CURIAM. Upon the state’s proper confession of error, we reverse the trial court’s adjudication of delinquency on the authority of J.D. v. State, 549 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Reversed.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw