DAMEN JENKINS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1989-09-28
No. 88-844
Daniel, C.J., Cowart, J., Goshorn, J.
549 So. 2d 247 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1989)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

A defendant's sentence was vacated because the trial court imposed a sentence far exceeding the 18-month cap agreed to in the plea agreement, and the defendant must be given the opportunity to withdraw his plea or the court must resentence him in accordance with the agreement or with his knowing waiver.


Holding

When a trial court imposes a sentence that violates a plea agreement, the defendant must be given the opportunity to withdraw his plea before sentencing, or the court must resentence him in accordance with the agreement or with his knowing waiver.


Headnotes

[1] When a trial court refuses to honor a plea agreement at sentencing, the defendant must be given the opportunity to withdraw his plea before sentencing, or the court may r…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Jenkins entered into a plea agreement with the State whereby he would plead guilty and the State agreed the sentence would not exceed 18 months concur…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant and the State entered into a plea agreement to the effect that the defendant would plead guilty to a certain criminal charge and the State agreed that the sentence would not exceed 18 months’ confinement to be served concurrent with any sentence on another criminal offense for which the defendant was on probation. The plea offer was never withdrawn by either party. To the contrary, pursuant to this agreement the defendant tendered a plea of guilty which the trial court formally accepted after making all the inquiries, ad-visements and determinations required by the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. However, at sentencing the State recommended 9 years confinement and the trial judge sentenced the defendant to a term of ten years’ incarceration plus five years’ probation. The defendant appeals.

The sentence imposed is vacated. If the trial court is unwilling to impose a sentence in accordance with the plea agreement, before being sentenced the defendant should be given an opportunity to withdraw his plea and proceed to trial. Of course, the court may also resentence the defendant unrestricted by the plea agreement if the defendant voluntarily and freely waives that portion of the plea agreement limiting sentencing.

SENTENCE VACATED, CAUSE REMANDED for further proceedings.

DANIEL, C.J., and COWART and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw