CHARLES LUCIAN MCLEOD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Possession Of Marijuana cases and more on FLexlaw
DANIEL, Chief Judge.
Appellant, Charles Lucian McLeod, appeals his conviction and sentence for cultivation of marijuana and possession of marijuana.
We find McLeod’s appeal without merit, but remand to the trial court for the entry of a corrected judgment. The defendant was charged in count II of the information with possession of marijuana under section 893.13(l)(f), a third degree felony and section 893.13(l)(g), a misdemeanor. The judgment reads that the defendant was convicted of “section 893.13(l)(f), a misdemeanor.” This was evidently a typographical error. There is no evidence in the record of the amount of marijuana the defendant had in his possession. The judgment should read “section 893.13(l)(g), a misdemeanor.”
AFFIRMED and REMANDED for entry of a corrected judgment.
COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
State v. DeSHONG, 603 So. 2d 1349 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)…CION TO JUSTIFY A SAFETY-RELATED TRAFFIC STOP In order to effect a valid stop for DUI, the officer need only have a “founded suspicion” of criminal activity. See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); Piediscalzo v. State, 549 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); § 901.-151, Fla.Stat. (Supp.1990). Thereafter, the probable cause needed to arrest or to suspend a license for DUI may be based upon evidence obtained during the standard procedures following a valid traffic stop. See State v. Ca…
-
Winters v. State, 578 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…onable belief that the person temporarily detained is armed with a dangerous weapon.). Nevertheless, the search may not ordinarily go beyond a pat-down of the outer clothing. Walker v. State, 514 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Piediscalzo v. State, 549 So. 2d 255, 257 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). Seizure is permissible [*7] if the officer reasonably believes the object felt in a pat-down was a weapon. Id. A pat-down in this case would have revealed no hard object which could have been a weapon. See id. We add that th…
-
Harris v. State, 574 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)…contained therein, exceeded the scope of a protective pat-down and was also constitutionally impermissible. See Blair v. State, 563 So. 2d 824 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Sanchez v. State, 516 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); see also, Piediscalzo v. State, 549 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). Since the search of appellant’s person was unlawful, the physical evidence and statements derived therefrom should have been suppressed. See Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 83 S.Ct. 407, 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963). The judgme…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence