FREDDIE R. TAYLOR, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Miller v. Schou, 616 So. 2d 436 (Fla. 1993)
  …s of Miller’s additional informational requests. For the foregoing reasons, we quash the decision below and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. The opinion of the district court of appeal in Braverman v. Braverman, 549 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 3d DCA1989), is disapproved to the extent it is inconsistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. BARRETT, C.J., and SHAW, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. McDONALD, J., concurs with an opinion. OVERTON, J., concurs in result only. . The $…
• ORR v. ORR, 621 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)
  …litigation, the husband stipulated that he had the financial ability to pay any increases in alimony and child support that the court determined to be appropriate. Based on that stipulation and the Third District’s opinion in Braverman v. Braverman, 549 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), the trial court refused to permit the wife to conduct discovery as to the husband’s current finances. The holding in Braverman has recently been rejected by our supreme court in Miller v. Schou, 616 So. 2d 436 (Fla.1993). Followi…
• Schou v. Miller, 583 So. 2d 805 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
  …ility to satisfy any increase in the child’s needs sought by the mother, if awarded by the court. This order plainly represents a departure from the essential requirements of the law as established in, among many other cases, Bravemnan v. Braverman, 549 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), and Young v. Young, 456 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Contrary to the trial judge’s view, the subsequent enactment of section 61.30(12), Florida Statutes (1989),1 does not change the result. If arguendo the provision conflicts…

Authorities Cited

• R.C. Stewart v. State, 511 So. 2d 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)