JEAN SRENCO AND JACQUELINE S. SINCOFF, APPELLANTS,
v.
HAROLD SRENCO, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF LILLIAN PAUL, APPELLEE
JEAN SRENCO AND JACQUELINE S. SINCOFF, APPELLANTS,
HAROLD SRENCO, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF LILLIAN PAUL, APPELLEE
549 So. 2d 774
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Jean Srenco and Jacqueline Sincoff appeal from a final judgment denying their Petition for Revocation of Probate of Will. The court found that Lillian Paul’s will had not been revoked by her physical act, pursuant to section 732.506, Florida Statutes (1987). We affirm.
After a careful review of the record and upon our inspection of the will itself, we cannot say that the finding below was clearly erroneous.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
E.M. v. State, 551 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)…PER CURIAM. On the State’s confession of error, the adjudications of delinquency are reversed under authority of A.E. v. State, 549 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), and of E.L.S. v. State, 547 So. 2d 298 (Fla. 3d DCA, 1989). Reversed.…
-
Z.S. v. State, 579 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…there was insufficient evidence to establish that Z.S. was guilty of theft of the vehicle. The most the evidence showed was that Z.S. pumped gas into a stolen Jeep. Consequently, there was no proof of either possession or intent. See A.E. v. State, 549 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); E.L.S. v. State, 547 So. 2d 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Accordingly, we reverse and order Z.S. discharged. LEHAN and HALL, JJ., concur. . Section 812.014, Florida Statutes (1989), defines theft as follows: 1) A person is guilty o…
-
J.D. v. State, 550 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)…reconsideration of the disposition. At trial, the state proved only that J.D. was a passenger in the stolen vehicle. The state did not prove the element of intent necessary for a burglary conviction. § 810.02, Fla.Stat. (1987); see A.E. v. State, 549 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); E.L.S. v. State, 547 So. 2d 298 (Fla.3d DCA 1989); B.L.W. v. State, 393 So. 2d 59 (Fla.3d DCA 1981) (mere presence in stolen vehicle insufficient to support theft and burglary convictions). Reversed in part, affirmed in part, a…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence