KELVIN B. WRIGHT, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
KELVIN B. WRIGHT, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
549 So. 2d 1148
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 15 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. DeLuca v. State, 384 So. 2d 212, 212-13 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), rev. denied, 389 So. 2d 1108 (Fla.1980); Jones v. State, 360 So. 2d 1293, 1296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Stanley v. State, 357 So. 2d 1031, 1034 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 364 So. 2d 891 (Fla.1978); Tennant v. State, 205 So. 2d 324, 324-325 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967), cert. denied, 210 So. 2d 227 (Fla.1968).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Hughes, 562 So. 2d 795 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)…ng or coercive indicia of seizure outlined in U.S. v. Mendenhall. The appellant was not physically detained, ordered to stop, or held in any manner. 545 So. 2d at 306, 307. See also McLane v. Rose, 537 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1989); State v. G.H., 549 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1989); State v. Simons, 549 So. 2d 785 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1989); Lightbourne v. State, 438 So. 2d 380 (Fla.1983). The appellees were not stopped, physically detained or held in any manner. The officers did not do or say anything to communi…
-
State v. Ojeda, 147 So. 3d 53 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)…so State v. Dickson, 35 So. 3d 1027, 1027 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); State v. Wong, 990 So. 2d 1154,1156 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008); State v. Casey, 821 So. 2d 1187, 1188 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Cordero v. State, 669 So. 2d 1075,1076 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); State v. G.H., 549 So. 2d 1148,1149 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Moreover, Detective Orenstein and Officer Benjamin had every right to proceed to the front door of the house where Detective Orenstein thought Ojeda might be found. It was Detective Oren-stein’s intent as he approached the…
-
D.M.L. v. State, 773 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)…, may determine the credibility of a witness. However, while the judge may find that a witness is not credible, such a finding does not permit the judge to interpret that witness’s testimony contrary to what was actually testified.”); State v. G.H., 549 So. 2d 1148, 1149 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (trial court not free to reject witness’ materially consistent and uncontroverted testimony); Republic Nat’l Bank of Miami, N.A. v. Roca, 534 So. 2d 736, 738 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (“A trial court cannot arbitrarily reject unreb…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Stanley v. State, 357 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
- Blowers v. Williams, 360 So. 2d 1293 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)
- Jones v. State, 360 So. 2d 1293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
- Tennant v. State, 205 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967)
- DeLUCA v. State, 384 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)
- State ex rel. Lawrence v. Turner, 210 So. 2d 227 (Fla. 1968)
- Woods v. Battey, 210 So. 2d 227 (Fla. 1968)