CLIFFORD WAYNE WALLER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
The trial court has the responsibility to determine the correct amount of restitution under section 948.03(l)(e), Florida Statutes, and in this case erred in delegating its responsibility to the probation officer. See Hamrick v. State, 532 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). The appellant’s other point on appeal is without merit.
That part of the order of probation providing for restitution to be determined by the probation officer is reversed and the cause is remanded for the trial court to determine the correct amount of restitution, after notice and hearing.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.
COWART and GOSHORN, JJ., and HARRIS, Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Schott v. State, 641 So. 2d 465 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)…delines scoresheet. The scoresheet reflects that points were assessed for legal constraint based on an outstanding capias, however, the state did not establish that the capias was outstanding at the time these crimes were committed. Kinman v. State, 550 So. 2d 1190, 1191 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). Defendant also argues that the trial court failed to adequately determine whether his [*466] plea was voluntary. Because this is a direct appeal from a guilty plea, and defendant made no motion in the trial court to with…
-
Pigue v. State, 567 So. 2d 530 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)…ppear for a criminal proceeding so as to warrant the scoring of an additional six points under Item IV of the score-sheet, entitled “Legal status at the time of offense.” The history simply shows “bond estreated” and the date. C.f., Kinman v. State, 550 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) (error to assess points for legal constraint where state failed to demonstrate that there are warrants issued for defendant’s arrest); Humphrey v. State, 543 So. 2d 420 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) (error to assess points for legal constr…
-
Farley Gilbert v. State, 600 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)…wherein the trial court improperly delegated its authority to determine the amount of restitution to the probation officer. Bowen v. State, 590 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); Williams v. State, 553 So. 2d 797 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Waller v. State, 550 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Brown v. State, 546 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). Upon remand, the defendant shall be afforded prior notice and an opportunity to be heard on the imposition of restitution. Fitzpatrick v. State, 553 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 5th DCA 1…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Hamrick v. State, 532 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)